08/08/2015

Girl power vs. the Ancient Greeks (circa 2015)

(Source: Gaggle/Almeida Theatre)

I’m coming to the end of my time in London, so this week I managed to squeeze in two Greek plays at the Almeida (thank goodness for student prices). On Wednesday, I saw Euripides’ Bakkhai, newly translated by Anne Carson and starring Ben Whishaw as Dionysus. Then last night, I saw Aristophanes’ Lysistrata, performed by Gaggle and starring Charlotte Church. While the tone of these plays is very different (the first a tragedy, the second a comedy) both explore gender politics through the power (and the threat) of a large group of women speaking and acting collectively. Take these plays from their original context (fifth century BC Athens), and it’s surprising just how relevant the issues they present remain in contemporary society. It was only through seeing two striking groups of female performers in such quick succession that I realised how unusual it is to see women given a space in this way.

The Bakkhai are a chorus of women who have gathered in the mountains to carry out Dionysian rituals, to dance and wear ivy and drink wine. They are positioned physically and ideologically between the neglected, offended god Dionysus and the dismissive Pentheus, King of Thebes. To what extent this position is elected is ambiguous, creating a tension that runs right through the play to its painful climax. At a critical moment in the action, Ben Whishaw (Dionysus) stands opposite Bertie Carvel (Pentheus) in the middle of the stage. Whishaw is wearing a dress and holding a thyrsus that mimics the curves of his slight frame, while Carvel stands tall and straight, almost hypermasculine by comparison. Dionysus advises Pentheus to dress up as a woman, and Pentheus’ response is one of horror – it would mean giving up his status as man and ruler, and all the social and cultural connotations of this identity. Meanwhile, the Bakkhai interject with song and dance, commanding the stage with a different kind of control that contradicts their association with weakness and frenzy, making them more dangerous.

As object of worship, Dionysus is simultaneously compelling and repugnant (a combination which Whishaw negotiates very successfully, demonstrated similarly in his previous role as Richard II). However, Anne Carson and James MacDonald don’t make it easy for us as an audience – there is no explicit ideological stance taken in this production. This is most clear in the unforgettable (and troubling) acts of the Bakkhai women. Their idol-worship of Dionysus is uncomfortable, their final, brutal undertaking vicious and painful. In the rare moments in which they use speech rather than song, their robotic, monotonous use of the singular pronoun ‘I’ jars against their sophisticated musical harmonies. And yet the overwhelming impression they create remains one of incredible power. The other characters become secondary to their mesmerising collective presence. The Bakkhai women are not just a mass saying the same things in the same way. Instead, they create a textured visual and aural scape on the stage which continues to surprise, to engage, and to shock, far more hypnotic than Dionysus could ever be.

Bakkhai creates an uneasy ethical situation, especially as a woman viewer. On the one hand, the Bakkhai women appear to be possessed, being used as a weapon by a single male divine figure. On the other hand, to dismiss their anger, celebration and seeming liberation from repressive practices as a product of outside manipulation limits their agency and responsibility. It risks belittling the legitimacy of female anger and ecstasy. This problem persists in contemporary feminist debate, and is something at the forefront of Deborah Coughlin’s Lysistrata. Like the Bakkhai women, Gaggle completely own the stage. They stamp and they thump and they work with and against each other, making a wall of sound. Again, their collectivity is paramount, but they refuse to be homogeneous.

Lysistrata is about the capacity of women to influence change. Dissatisfied by pervading warfare, a group of women decide to hold a sex strike until war ends. Coughlin brings the drama to post-election Britain. There is a failed politician (Charlotte Church), a well-off alcoholic (Katy Menczer), a mum-of-ten (Jamie-Rose Monk), and an outspoken hairdresser (Lauren La Rocque). There’s also God in a glittery dress (Scarlett Lasoff) and an ever-so-slightly-irritating newsreader (Roberta Morris). And yet, to classify the women in this way (as if they were contestants on Masterchef) seems entirely to defeat the point. What this production demonstrates is that women from different backgrounds can work together to dismantle oppressive systems. It might not be plain sailing, it might even end up as a kind of tragedy itself (in the newspaper sense of the word), but the emphasis is ultimately on collective movement and energy, exploring the places where experiences intersect and differ, rather than pursuing a kind of individualism that ultimately reproduces rather than challenges existing structures.

Lysistrata ends with ‘Make Love Not War’, a song with a pulsing beat that reinforces the creativity and celebration involved in collective action, while maintaining the anger providing its impetus and dynamism. Instead of a usual music video setup, in which female performers are filtered through a gaze explicitly gendered male, Gaggle rock the boat. There are flashing penis graphics and all kinds of fun things, but, more importantly, there is a group of women confidently asserting their sexuality, for themselves and for each other. It was frightening to realise just how radical this seems. You only have to scroll absent-mindedly through the comments of almost any article on feminism and feminist action (or even just women) to find people who evidently feel intimidated by and hostile towards groups of women, especially ones who are enjoying themselves against the status quo, or demanding change. Two and a half thousand years after they were written, plays like Bakkhai and Lysistrata can still shock – not because of some incredible transcendent quality of the writing, but because our gender politics remain skewed to the extent that women collectively can still very easily and very believably be portrayed as a threat.